Just in case
Jan. 6th, 2009 11:16 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
FYI in case lj shuts down:
my email is edcasual at earthlink dot net
Perhaps we should have a thread on
poptimists about contingency plans if lj actually does go down.
For those not following the story, livejournal laid off a whole hunk of its San Francisco staff, 13 of 30 people says one news site, 20 of 28 says another. Its own not-very-informative statement (at least according to this site) goes:
LiveJournal Inc. today announced a restructuring of their US and Russian operations to more effectively manage costs in light of the global economic downturn. LiveJournal Inc.'s headquarters, technical operations (and servers), legal, administration and the customer service teams will remain in the United States. LiveJournal's global product development and design will now be coordinated out of its Moscow office. The pooling of resources between the US and Russia will allow the company to build a stronger business model, well positioned to guarantee the long-term success of LiveJournal.
As a result of these changes Matthew Berardo, VP and General Manager of LiveJournal Inc., will be leaving the company along with other valued colleagues. Mr Berardo has played the leading role in consolidating product and design effort to enable the business to more effectively streamline costs during his tenure. LiveJournal Inc. will now be led jointly by Stephanie Gravelle, currently LiveJournal Inc.'s director of finance and administration and Sergei Komarov, currently CTO of SUP (the owners of LiveJournal).
I'm curious if anyone knows what LiveJournal's business model was at the start, and what it is now - as in, how they make their money.
Someone spammed a comment thread with good words about this journal sharing site [EDIT: Insane Journal]. But again, can such a site really get a consistent source of income?
By the way, all along I've been downloading most of the journal entries/comment threads where I've made a comment.
my email is edcasual at earthlink dot net
Perhaps we should have a thread on
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
For those not following the story, livejournal laid off a whole hunk of its San Francisco staff, 13 of 30 people says one news site, 20 of 28 says another. Its own not-very-informative statement (at least according to this site) goes:
LiveJournal Inc. today announced a restructuring of their US and Russian operations to more effectively manage costs in light of the global economic downturn. LiveJournal Inc.'s headquarters, technical operations (and servers), legal, administration and the customer service teams will remain in the United States. LiveJournal's global product development and design will now be coordinated out of its Moscow office. The pooling of resources between the US and Russia will allow the company to build a stronger business model, well positioned to guarantee the long-term success of LiveJournal.
As a result of these changes Matthew Berardo, VP and General Manager of LiveJournal Inc., will be leaving the company along with other valued colleagues. Mr Berardo has played the leading role in consolidating product and design effort to enable the business to more effectively streamline costs during his tenure. LiveJournal Inc. will now be led jointly by Stephanie Gravelle, currently LiveJournal Inc.'s director of finance and administration and Sergei Komarov, currently CTO of SUP (the owners of LiveJournal).
I'm curious if anyone knows what LiveJournal's business model was at the start, and what it is now - as in, how they make their money.
Someone spammed a comment thread with good words about this journal sharing site [EDIT: Insane Journal]. But again, can such a site really get a consistent source of income?
By the way, all along I've been downloading most of the journal entries/comment threads where I've made a comment.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 06:20 pm (UTC)http://fawx.com/software/ljarchive/
no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 06:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 06:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 06:32 pm (UTC)ljbook won't do communities, unfortunately. or well, anything at the minute.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 06:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 06:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 06:37 pm (UTC)it won't do poptimists, argh!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 07:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 08:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 09:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-01-07 07:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 06:38 pm (UTC)http://www.myspace.com/frankkogan
and here is its blog:
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.ListAll&friendID=76037354
no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 07:00 pm (UTC)Long story, but Wiki has a good overview of it here. Basically:
However, since the sale to Six Apart and then to SUP, LJ has been relying more and more on ads -- see the wank over the addition of "Plus" accounts, the removal of "Basic" accounts, and the inclusion of ads when "Basic" accounts were reinstated. (Can't find the initial Basic-kill announcement post, but here's Brad Fitzpatrick's take on it, and the subsequent announcements are all up on
I doubt LJ will go down completely -- it's big, it's popular, I'm sure SUP will be happy to keep running it even if US operations go down, and I'm sure someone will want it if SUP decides to give it up -- but it might change. (For the worse. SUP is like the shittiest company in the history of companies -- frankly the best thing that could happen to LJ would be SUP selling it to Google to be eaten by Blogger or something.)
no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 07:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 08:19 pm (UTC)I personally think this is a "the sky is falling" knee jerk reaction by the general community.
Yes, LJ may be in trouble financially and laying off, but so are a LOT of other companies. The fact is that LJ is the 76th most visited site in the world, 61st in the United States and 10th most visited in Russia. This is no small potatoes.
Perhaps it just isn't being run well at the moment. I would think it would be prime real estate to be bought out before it is just shut down (and I wouldn't be surprised if it was a Russian company).
no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 08:42 pm (UTC)Just what is it that livejournal sells.
We should be thinking of alternatives anyway, since various defects in comparison to ilX - especially nested comments and no "updated threads" notification within a community - make lj hard to use for what we're trying to do on
no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 08:58 pm (UTC)Actually, it sells a combination of ads to advertisers and services to users (paid accounts, additional userpics, etc.) but SUP (the Russian company which owns the US-based LiveJournal, Inc.) has spent the past year alienating vast swaths of the userbase -- so I would guess that services aren't selling quite as well as they used to, and I would also guess that is related to this round of layoffs. (Which would really suck, because it would mean that the LiveJournal, Inc. staff is essentially taking the fall for SUP's shite business practices).
I think a typical message board might be best for what you want out of
no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 09:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 09:53 pm (UTC)Also, do you think they get paid per click? I assume they sell ads at set rates based on page views, the same way print publications (and Gawker Media, yeah?) do.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-01-07 01:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 09:48 pm (UTC)fleddevoted less time to their previous message board, going tono subject
Date: 2009-01-06 09:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 09:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 09:40 pm (UTC)