According to AP story Drug Traces Common In Tap Water (title a bit misleading, since the drug traces may well be common in filtered and bottled water too; and by drugs they also mean hormones and the like, pharmaceuticals in general)
Summary:
--Trace amounts of drugs, hormones, etc. are common in drinking water sources, including headwaters and aquifers (get into the environment from humans and livestock excreting the pharmaceuticals into sewage and from leakage in manufacturing)
--The long-term effects of these traces of pharmaceuticals on humans and other living things is not well understood, but studies of wildlife are disturbing (e.g., male fish developing female characteristics), and medications are of special concern because most are designed to work on the human body - this doesn't mean that they're necessarily dangerous in these trace amounts but rather that we don't know
--There are no standards or regulations regarding their presence
--There isn't extensive screening yet to see how much is in the water
--There are no current sewage systems designed to remove pharmaceuticals
--The current technologies that could remove the pharmaceuticals may be prohibitively inefficient and expensive
Summary:
--Trace amounts of drugs, hormones, etc. are common in drinking water sources, including headwaters and aquifers (get into the environment from humans and livestock excreting the pharmaceuticals into sewage and from leakage in manufacturing)
--The long-term effects of these traces of pharmaceuticals on humans and other living things is not well understood, but studies of wildlife are disturbing (e.g., male fish developing female characteristics), and medications are of special concern because most are designed to work on the human body - this doesn't mean that they're necessarily dangerous in these trace amounts but rather that we don't know
--There are no standards or regulations regarding their presence
--There isn't extensive screening yet to see how much is in the water
--There are no current sewage systems designed to remove pharmaceuticals
--The current technologies that could remove the pharmaceuticals may be prohibitively inefficient and expensive
no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 04:09 pm (UTC)It's particularly the female hormones that worry me, since they're sort of... unnecessary isn't totally the word but they're non-essential. I mean, obviously the other drugs are a concern but in particular in this country there are a hell of a lot of people taking hormones and indeed it's virtually NHS policy to hand the pill to any female under 40 that goes to the doctor, just in case.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 04:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 04:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 04:44 pm (UTC)at least there's no cholera in it...
no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 04:50 pm (UTC)Hmmm. I don't doubt that dudes are more infertile these days because of hormones in drinking water, but if you think about it, if everyone's on the pill anyway then clearly they *don't* want to get preggers? I guess it's a bit much asking everyone who is trying to conceive to start chugging away on Evian though. I dunno.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 04:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 04:31 pm (UTC)That's not to say it isn't a genuine concern, obviously.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 04:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 04:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 04:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 04:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 04:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 05:02 pm (UTC)i've been rereading lots of late 50s early 60s science fiction: blimey they were gung ho back then for the next-stage evolutionary mutation (strangely it always involves become more like an insect)
no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 05:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 05:16 pm (UTC)Or developing powers of telepathy!
no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 05:18 pm (UTC)Wyndham's science fiction may be considered trendsetting in its insistence that interplanetary catastrophes do not just happen to "other people" (e.g. those best-equipped to face them) and would in fact be extremely difficult for our delicate and highly interconnected civilisation to deal with. Similarly ahead of its time is the emphasis that Wyndham put on disruptions to the biosphere as a whole
no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 05:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 05:26 pm (UTC)bowie's "oh you pretty things" is based on the midwich cuckoos (i believe)
no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 06:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-10 06:12 pm (UTC)That is, the devil not being God, he (the devil) always screws up in some way or another.