koganbot: (Default)
[personal profile] koganbot
In preparation for my latest column, which has developed an ever-expanding flexible deadline now that it's back to online only (otherwise it would have been due five hours ago) I have been posing the all-important question "Why does Taylor Swift only wear dresses? No skirts, no pants, just dresses. And why these particular dresses?" (In a short CMT interview Taylor said, "Dresses are my weakness, seriously," and mentioned that she loves Forever 21 and BCBG, but doesn't go into why.)



I posed this question on Rolling Country, if you want to see what I said (scroll down near the bottom), but actually, the only good analytical Taylor Swift sartorial commentary I found was from a mom of four in Ohio who blogs about raising the kids, one of her little girls having recently become obsessed with Taylor:

Taylor Swift is everything a little girl would appreciate. She's cute, has long blonde hair, wears cool cowgirl boots and has the girliest dresses going.

Dad apparently holds Taylor Swift responsible for creating the mold for little-girl taste such as his daughter's, while mom says that Taylor "can't be blamed for little girls' attraction to frilly dresses, sing songy melodies and all things pretty."

Taylor's most recent object of girl envy is a sparkling guitar. Covered with Swarovski crystals, it was first seen in her most recent video for "Our Song" and made an appearance at the recent Country Music Awards. You can't see it and not notice it.

So, anyway, little girl asks Santa for a Taylor Swift guitar and a Taylor Swift dress, and Santa not only comes through - with little black dress comes a black headband and black gloves like Taylor's - but also a pair of black cowboy boots like Taylor's that the little girl "didn't order." "It took her a minute or two to grasp the concept that they were hers even though she hadn't included them in her list of what her dad has dubbed the Taylor Swift starter stalker kit."

OK, obviously Taylor looks really good in the dresses she chooses, which vary from sundresses to prom dresses, but she also looks good in the one photo I found of her in jeans, and lots of country performers who don't shun the feminine and don't shun dresses (Faith Hill, LeAnn Rimes, Miranda Lambert, Carrie Underwood, Deana Carter, Martina McBride, Kellie Pickler) will sometimes wear jeans or pants and unlike Taylor haven't turned dresses into almost a signature. And Gretchen Wilson, who never wears dresses, looks plenty hot. Gretchen goes more for the working-class sassy broad look, the big-bosomed tough-girl, w/ low-necked blouses and bouncing tits.



Obviously, Gretchen's not going for an upmarket look, but it seems to me that it's too quick and easy to say that Taylor is, or to identify Taylor as a prep. There's something too idiosyncratic about Taylor's look, for one thing. Also, she's accessibly dressy, her style of clothes available at relatively inexpensive knockoff joints like Forever 21. She's not going to be wowing the sk8ers and the emos, but the rednecks and the grits won't necessarily be averse. That's my guess.

Date: 2008-01-23 01:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skyecaptain.livejournal.com
Yeah, Taylor Swift is one of only a select few non-Disney-product country artists that gets airplay lately -- Carrie Underwood gets some airplay, but (IIRC) for a Disney film soundtrack, ditto Rascal Flatts, and in another sorta way ditto Billy Ray Cyrus (hard to believe they'd play his single if not for Miley). So that's a whole demographic group that doesn't seem to apply to any other artist, although it might be that kids who listen to Disney-pop listen to country radio outside of Disney (I imagine there's similar Christian subculture crossover with Disney listeners).

Date: 2008-01-23 05:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skyecaptain.livejournal.com
Haha, woops, looks like the world imploded...I guess I've fallen into the parallel universe for good.

But yeah, I know exactly zilch about country radio's demographic. Someone 'round here Nashville or otherwise countrily-oriented might have some info, right?

Date: 2008-01-23 10:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] katstevens.livejournal.com
I wonder if she just had a phase of wearing dresses for a few months, happened to get super-famous then and was stuck with the perma-dress look as her recognisable image?

Another example is our Lily, who has pretty much trademarked the whole ballgown + trainers look. Her reasoning is a little more practical though (paraphrasing as I can't find the interview anywhere): "I don't like my thighs, ballgowns are good for hiding them. And trainers are comfy."

Date: 2008-01-23 03:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] katstevens.livejournal.com
Ahhhhh she's tall? Well that explains it, dude. I dunno about America, but British girls over 5"10 with long legs generally have to go to specialist clothes shops to buy posh trousers that fit. Long-leg jeans are easier to acquire but you're stuck if you want something 'pretty'.

I am 5'8" and have long legs. Pairs of jeans I own: 5. Pairs of trousers I own: 1, as part of awful trouser suit. Dresses I would actually wear somewhere that wasn't like, meeting the Queen at the opera or something: 0. My dress choices really are limited as I have very broad shoulders and a tiny waist (swimming there, marvellous), so finding something that fits and looks good is a nightmare. And I'm THIN and a reasonable height! So I don't really blame Tyler for sticking to something that makes her look good.

Profile

koganbot: (Default)
Frank Kogan

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
7891011 1213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 3rd, 2026 03:22 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios