koganbot: (Default)
[personal profile] koganbot
From June 6 to July 11 the number 1 song on Billboard's adult contemporary chart was Taylor Swift's "Love Story." From July 18 through October 24 it was Miley Cyrus's "The Climb." From October 31 through December 26 (which hasn't happened yet, but Billboard can read palms), it was/is Taylor Swift's "You Belong With Me." To put this in perspective, number 1 right now on Radio Disney's Dot Com request line is Iyaz, who's 22 years old, making him a couple of years older than Taylor and five years older than Miley. Taylor, by the way, turned 20 last week; does this mean her reign as an adult contemporary queen may be in jeopardy?

Date: 2009-12-23 04:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tyropshaw.livejournal.com
I'm confused. Taylor is still # 1 on a future chart and you question whether her made up title of "Adult Contemporary Queen" is in jeopardy because some guy who is 22 is #1 on the Disney charts? First, I doubt this "lyaz" wants to be the queen of anything. Second, your own facts show that a younger artist had already took MS. Swift place on the A.C.chart and Swift got it back and held it longer. Third, what would Ms. Swift be other than Adult Contemporary? Or more precisely how would she be excluded from that marketing category (as she could simultaneously also be marketed as just plain "pop" or "country"? There seems to be many people past 21 who make the adult contemporary charts. That Miley Cyrus does too is interesting, but it might be as much about how radio programmers define their audiences (younger is always better) as the artists and listeners themselves. If Taylor Swift, who styles herself after adult contemporary country queens, isn't adult contemporary than what is she?

With that said, I have a question for you. As you seem to be a huge fan of Taylor Swift and, to a lesser extent, other young American female pop stars whose lyrics seem partially torn from their own diaries, do you have any thoughts/opinions on the British pop singers who are essentially do the same thing? Specifically, I mean people like Kate Nash, Emmy the Great, and, especially, Laura Marling. I find it especially difficult to take Swift seriously after hearing Marling's songs, though I can understand potential differences of tastes in regards to both subject matter and their interpretation of their intended audience.

Date: 2009-12-27 06:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tyropshaw.livejournal.com
Yeah, I picked the wrong post to express my curiosity. Mostly, I was interested in whether you had any opinion on the young female singer/songwriters "across the pond," either compared to Swift or on their own, since you seem to take Ms. Swift more seriously, in terms of pop music history, than most people I've read.

As for Swift, I now cringe at my "difficult to take seriously" remark, though I did attempt to qualify it as a matter of outlook/taste. I do think, and believe I've read, that Swift at one point did want to style herself after the Adult Contemporary country queens I alluded to and you named, but I don't necessarily believe that's a bad thing. It's Swift's (or any artist's) intelligence and creativity that determines her value, not a selection of random influences/inspirations.

Profile

koganbot: (Default)
Frank Kogan

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
7891011 1213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 7th, 2026 12:25 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios