![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
People keep adding interesting answers to my Decade's End question, if you want to go back and look. In the meantime I've gotten another response via email, which I'm putting into the comments. The question is:
What do you think the story of the decade in music is? Or what was the story of the decade in music for you? I said "Just list one" last time, but I've kind of added a second question here in adding that "for you" bit, haven't I? So if you answered one of them last time ("what the story is") and the other ("what the story is for me" ["me" being you]) is different, you're invited to answer the second one here in the comments. (And you can comment on the last comments in these comments if you want, lj's "use-by" date being so frustratingly quick.)
What do you think the story of the decade in music is? Or what was the story of the decade in music for you? I said "Just list one" last time, but I've kind of added a second question here in adding that "for you" bit, haven't I? So if you answered one of them last time ("what the story is") and the other ("what the story is for me" ["me" being you]) is different, you're invited to answer the second one here in the comments. (And you can comment on the last comments in these comments if you want, lj's "use-by" date being so frustratingly quick.)
no subject
Date: 2009-11-25 06:50 pm (UTC)story of rockwrite and that story I'm slowly sketching out on the blog. The bottom line though is
that rockwrite transformed from an individual practice to a conversation. There are always conversational and social elements of individual writing but more frequently these days when someone wants good rock criticism I think immediately of back and forth participatory writing before published pieces. I think it's a shift that's 80% me and 20% the decade.