Yeah, but at least when I try to figure out size 10, I get to listen to music.
Actually, in all seriousness, the reason I've never understood reading Hegel, etc. is because so much of the conversation seems to revolve around trying to figure out what these terrible writers were saying and why -- the conversation is about the conversation, and it never touches the real world. I remember arguing with a professor about Russell's "the king of France is bald" thing, and saying, "But that's not the way it works in language." And he said, "But that's the way it works in logic," and I said, "But that's not the way it works in language," and he said, "But logic doesn't care." And I thought, well, shouldn't it? If you're having a discussion about the logic of language, then shouldn't you actually care about the actual properties and uses of language? If the only way you can make your argument is by disregarding all the ways the real world doesn't agree with it, then it's not a very strong argument. I mean, is there something I'm missing?
It just seems like all that finance stuff where there's no actual money, or mathematical physics that doesn't take into account the actual world. Yes, the emperor's clothes are very beautiful, etc. Pardon me while I buy a pair of pants that actually exist.
no subject
Actually, in all seriousness, the reason I've never understood reading Hegel, etc. is because so much of the conversation seems to revolve around trying to figure out what these terrible writers were saying and why -- the conversation is about the conversation, and it never touches the real world. I remember arguing with a professor about Russell's "the king of France is bald" thing, and saying, "But that's not the way it works in language." And he said, "But that's the way it works in logic," and I said, "But that's not the way it works in language," and he said, "But logic doesn't care." And I thought, well, shouldn't it? If you're having a discussion about the logic of language, then shouldn't you actually care about the actual properties and uses of language? If the only way you can make your argument is by disregarding all the ways the real world doesn't agree with it, then it's not a very strong argument. I mean, is there something I'm missing?
It just seems like all that finance stuff where there's no actual money, or mathematical physics that doesn't take into account the actual world. Yes, the emperor's clothes are very beautiful, etc. Pardon me while I buy a pair of pants that actually exist.