koganbot: (Default)
Frank Kogan ([personal profile] koganbot) wrote2009-08-04 06:43 am
Entry tags:

BAN POP MUSIC NOW!

Have been pointed to the Webpage for musoc.org, an activist site with avowed political intent that supports, among other things, the following ideas and policies:

--Art music is objectively superior to pop music.

--If you disagree you are a relativist.

--Anything that is not art music is pop music, so minimalism, 'total' serialism, musique concrète, etc. are pop music.

--Pop music should be BANNED from all public and work places that are not licensed entertainment venues.

--Pop music should be BANNED from children's television and other media.

(h/t Josh Kortbein)

[identity profile] piratemoggy.livejournal.com 2009-08-04 12:59 pm (UTC)(link)
The Department Of What The Fvck is having a busy afternoon, I see.

[identity profile] piratemoggy.livejournal.com 2009-08-04 02:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Also incidentally I'm not sure he understands the PRS music licensing policy re: 'entertainment venues' correctly. Workplaces DO have to be licensed to play pop music. And art music actually but y'know.

[identity profile] piratemoggy.livejournal.com 2009-08-04 02:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, hairdressers and shops and workplaces and things have to. Dunno how you'd catch a workplace if it was closed to the public or how big a workplace it'd have to be before you needed a license but yeah, everywhere that's conceivably benefitting financially from its use of music.

[identity profile] dubdobdee.livejournal.com 2009-08-04 02:29 pm (UTC)(link)
This may well not be the same in the US, or indeed any other country -- licensing and copyright law changes wildly from state to state...

[identity profile] piratemoggy.livejournal.com 2009-08-04 02:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh I know, I was just joking about the dude but it is a fair point.

Actually I think they do have it in the US tho. I do not know much about our copyright sistren and brethren across the sea except that we have to liase with them about Beyonce.